The United Nations’ (UN) Sustainable Development Goals and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset concept are essentially variations of the same theme.
In essence, these initiatives present a utopian vision for the world. According to the UN,
While these words may sound appealing, they often lack substantive meaning.
If one were to delve deeper into their implications, Sustainable Development serves as a framework for global governance, mass control, and mass surveillance, also known as the Fourth Industrial Revolution, a term coined by Klaus Schwab.
The UN operates as a centralised public-private partnership, enjoying support from a majority of global governments, corporations, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
This gives it a significant advantage in shaping global policy and, by extension, brings it a step closer to achieving global governance.
Iain Davis offers an analysis of how the global power structure is configured and the role the UN plays within it.
Contrary to its name, Sustainable Development is neither about sustainability nor development. Rather, it serves as a global framework for the gradual introduction of neo-Marxist ideologies, technocratic objectives, and centralised governance structures.
The concept of a “multipolar world” refers to a global order where power is distributed among multiple nations, such as the BRICS countries, as opposed to a unipolar world dominated by one or two major powers like the United States (US).