Falsifying history, although morally questionable at times, can be seen as a tool to challenge claims, narratives, and established truths.

Put another way, question everything you’ve been taught.

History is usually written by the victors and influenced by those who fund agendas, which tend to result in fabricated, biased or incomplete accounts of past events.

Question what you think you know

Put another way, question everything you’ve been taught.

By questioning and scrutinising historical claims, we can strive for a more accurate understanding of the past and avoid perpetuating distorted narratives.

The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.

George Orwell

Put another way, question everything you’ve been taught.

The Falsification of History

John Hamer is a historian who published The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality.

The Falsification of History, by John Hamer

The book is about a big problem affecting pretty much everyone: a huge lie that has been around for a very long time.

Which is that a small group of powerful people, who believe that they have the right to control humanity, have tricked us all and they use whatever way they can to achieve their goals.

Global public private partnerships
The global power structure (credit: Iain Davis)

History is almost never a neutral representation of facts and is almost always shaped to serve specific interests.

Hence the need to falsify the falsification.

By examining history, we can identify the biases and hidden agendas of the authors, although it is neither easy nor straightforward.

Critical thinking allows us to recognise how power dynamics, politics, and personal motivations can distort the historical record.

Is evolution bunk?
Is evolution bunk?

Furthermore, falsifying history can open up space for alternative voices and perspectives that have been marginalised or excluded from mainstream narratives.

By challenging established “truths”, we can shed light on previously overlooked events, individuals, or communities, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of history.

I don’t want a history of selected facts… I want the truth about everything.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

History is plagued by misinformation, propaganda, and deliberate fabrication.

For example, the Gulf Of Tonkin incident in 1964 was used as a justification for the escalation of the Vietnam War. However, it turned out that the entire event was a hoax.

Another example is the famous claim of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in Iraq, which formed a crucial part of the justification for the 2003 invasion. There were no WMDs in Iraq.

Topics covered

John’s book covers a lot of ground, including:

  • evolution,
  • the origins of humans,
  • Atlantis,
  • ancient bloodlines,
  • Freemasonry,
  • the Great Library of Alexandria,
  • false flag operations,
  • the Knights Templar,
  • who really wrote the works of Shakespeare,
  • the Federal Reserve,
  • the Frankfurt School, and
  • the diary of Anne Frank.

It’s a thick book and doesn’t need to be read in chronological order.

Evolution, for example

Evolution of mankind

For instance, in the chapter on evolution, John argues that the established narrative of human evolution is not only flawed but deliberately misleading, suggesting that the truth about the origins of the human race has been concealed.

I’ve always wondered about evolution, actually.

Sure, things naturally adapt to their environment, but from where does entirely new species information arrive? Variations within a species do not add new genetic information. And mutations tend to appear as a consequence of harm rather than beneficial evolution.

Furthermore, Charles Darwin was influenced by Thomas Malthus, which is a terrible start.

Here’s my conversation with John.

History is a set of lies agreed upon.

Napoleon Bonaparte

Comments are closed.