We need some sort of foundation to start this story on the hidden or occulted history of man, in order to understand its role in our present.
So we may as well start in Genesis. The biblical account of creation.
The importance of the biblical account will become more apparent as this story continues.
Other accounts of creation or spontaneous anti-entropy explosions of evolution, like the Big Bang, will also be dealt with in time, as they also have a role to play in the occult. But for now, let’s focus on the oldest, most well known account since the said account is thousands of years old, and is used not only by Abrahamic religions, but also by occulted societies as part of their mythos.
The time frame for this account of creation?
Many creationists will say that Earth is roughly 6000 years old, as this is the estimate of Masoretic scholars. According to this dating system, we are in 2022 AD.
This, however, aligns with the Masonic dating system, in which they say it is the year 6022 AL (Anno Lucis), or 6022 years since the “year of light”.
So, what are these two timekeeping systems referring to?
Are they referring to Adam and Eve and the serpent? And the two trees in the garden? Yes, is what both of these schools of thought would answer. So, why is it necessary to have two separate dating systems? In one, we are in the year 2022 AD (Earth and creation are roughly 6000 years old), and in the other we are in the year 6022 AL (Earth and creation are also roughly 6000 years old).
Well, something noticeable that should be pointed out is that the AD system is using the Messiah to pin its current year, whereas the Masonic AL system does not. The Masonic system does, however, start measuring time from the year their god was in the garden with Adam and Eve. Lucis is Latin for “light”, and Lucifer is Latin for “light bringer”.
Is it starting to make sense now, why they use the Anno Lucis dating system rather than the Anno Domini system?
Of course, Masonry will openly deny any fascination with the Bible and a particular character in the Bible. They will deny having anything to do with the editing of the King James Bible down to 66 books, leaving out many of the contextually valuable books found in the Apocrypha.
We do, however, see that a serpent is very often used in symbolism of international organisations such as the WHO. Wonder what a serpent has to do with “health”? Or does the serpent perhaps represent pharmakeia? It should be noted that according to the classical Biblical account the serpent is the deceiver; the opposer and nemesis of the Creator and the created.
Now, let’s return to after the creation of Adam and Eve.
When they were forbidden to eat a certain fruit from a certain “tree”. Symbols have been a way of communicating throughout the ages. Only in modern times have we been so inundated with corporate branding and their symbols that they have lost all meaning. However, those who still use symbolism as communication understand the hidden language being spoken.
So, is it a stretch to ask if the tree in Genesis from whose fruit they were not to eat, was another family tree, or people? A tree is often used to symbolise a “family tree” or a nation of people, as the Bible often uses the symbol of a tree to reference these.
Are fruit a metaphor for sexual relations? Children (and descendants) are often symbolised in the Bible. At this point it becomes important to note that there were other pre-Adamic people mentioned in the Biblical text, Apocrypha, and Dead Sea Scrolls (such as Enoch).
We sit with a problem in translation when it comes to our modern English versions of the Bible, and a problem of editing when it comes to missing Biblical texts, as there are two separate kinds of men identified in the original Hebrew or OBRY Biblical texts, who are Enosh and Adam. Adam refers to “people of the Adamic bloodline created in the garden”, whereas Enosh is used in a slightly different context, referring to man, but not of Adam.
We will explore this in more detail later. For now, let’s return to the Biblical story.
So, Eve is “beguiled” or seduced by the serpent. They eat of the “fruit” of the forbidden “tree”. Adam then shares the “fruit” with Eve. Their disobedience is discovered by God and he curses Adam, Eve, and the serpent for their disobedience. We are then told that Eve birthed two sons, Cain and Abel. However, only Abel and – later – Seth are mentioned as being part of Adam’s lineage even though Abel outlived his brother and was cursed by God for not being able to successfully till the earth. God rejected Cain’s sacrificial offering whereas he accepted Abel’s.
Could this be because Cain was the resultant “fruit” between the serpent and Eve, while Abel was the resultant “fruit” between Adam and Eve? (One from a lineage of fruit from a forbidden tree and the other from the sanctioned family tree.)
I will expand on these ideas in upcoming posts.
In the meantime if you’re so inclined and want to do some of your own research, I would recommend reading Morals And Dogma by Albert Pike, to gain some understanding on Masonic teachings as it relates to the Biblical account, bearing in mind that the language and symbols used are meant to deceive all who don’t understand their true meaning.
Another highly recommended book is The Curse Of Canaan by one of the original “conspiracy theorists”, Eustace Mullins .
