The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Jerm.
Just like Fauci stated, criticism of him is criticism of science. The same goes for Architects & Engineers For 911 Truth; criticism of them is criticism of science.
In this installment of my 10-year investigation into 9/11, I would like to expand on my observations in part one.
John Coleman is a scientist and founder of The Weather Channel, discussing problems with “the science”. Listen to what he has to say. That is why I discount the narrative of Architects & Engineers For 911 Truth, pushing the “demolition” argument.
HAARP and radio power
Many conspiracy theorists have come across HAARP and radio power. The former is said to also affect the ionosphere.
Operation of the research facility was transferred from the United States Air Force to the University of Alaska Fairbanks on Aug. 11, 2015, allowing HAARP to continue with exploration of ionospheric phenomenology via a land-use cooperative research and development agreement.
HAARP is the world’s most capable high-power, high-frequency transmitter for study of the ionosphere.
University Of Alaska
The Hutchinson Effect
John Hutchison is a lone ranger famous for “The Hutchinson Effect”.
In the interview above, he explains what he has managed to achieve. His work expands on the work of Nikola Tesla. John refers to the US Army’s various weapons’ research.
What secret weapons’ technology could have been around by 2001?
John Hutchinson’s interview was done in the early 1990s.
Now watch the following 1980’s multi-part CNN investigative report on RF (radio frequency) weaponry (or directed energy weapons), mentioning the work of Nikola Tesla.
Consider the following
We learned from weapons analyst, Tom Beardonm about scalar weapons. I suggest you read his piece on the history of scalar weapons. In the CNN investigative report, Tom mentions “balls of light”, “cold non-nuclear explosions” and “electromagnetic explosions”.
So, my question is: could such weapons have been perfected and used on 9/11?
The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Jerm.
