Skip to content
The myth of the knight in shining armour
· Revisionism

The myth of the knight in shining armour

Contrary to popular belief, knights never actually wore shining armour. Despite its romanticised portrayal in movies, the reality is more boring.

You know that phrase a knight in shining armour?

Well, it's not true.

Sorry, ladies. 💔

15th century Florentine painting with grey armour

In short, the knight in shining armour image is a product of storytelling rather than reality. The shiny appearance comes from the misconception that armour was always made of polished steel. As it turns out, armour was made from a variety of materials including leather, chain mail, and plate armour.

There is no greater glory than the honor of knighthood.

— Sir Thomas Malory

And, well, the primary purpose of armour was to protect, not to look pretty and sparkly.

Polished armour would quickly become scratched and dull in battle. Plus, keeping armour shiny would have been extremely labour-intensive and expensive.

King Henry VIII's armour, currently in New York

Our image of the knight in shining armour has been heavily influenced by Hollywood and books.

That's the truth.

Related

🎙️ Subscribe to my podcast

Jerm Warfare is constantly being censored, which means that the topics are over the target. Why are they threatened by my conversations?