A directed energy weapon (DEW) is a ranged weapon that damages its target with highly focused energy without a solid projectile.

Like a laser, which has a very concentrated (or directed) beam of light energy.

Directed energy weapons use a variety of energy sources including:

  • lasers,
  • microwaves,
  • particle beams and
  • sound.

Nothing new

The concept of using light and sound as weapons has been around for centuries, but the technology has only recently become good enough to be considered for military use.

The question, however, is how recently?

For example, the first DEWs were developed in the early 20th century, but they were not very powerful and had limited range. Meanwhile, in recent decades there has been significant progress and several countries now have operational directed energy weapons.

Lockhead Martin, for instance, has been bragging about its DEW technology for many years.

What is not known is how far along such progress is.

What is known is that such progress is likely further along than what is claimed.

Darker reality?

Why does the steel rod turn to dust?

What if directed energy weapons were used to destroy the Twin Towers?

In other words, what if the towers did not collapse “because of jet fuel“, but were destroyed via a high energy weapon system?

It sounds ridiculous until you think about it for a moment and look at the evidence, which is what my conversation with Judy Wood does, as well as my following conversation with Andrew Johnson whose book about the gatekeeping (whether by design or emergence) within the “9/11 truth movement” acts as a form of censorship and suppression of the facts.

In his book, Andrew analyses what actually happened and includes commentary on mind-bending physics surrounding the Hutchinson Effect, Nikola Tesla and geoengineering.

The book also looks at anomalies like:

  • the Columbia University seismographic data,
  • NASA AVIRIS dust and iron spectrometer imaging,
  • all seven WTC buildings destroyed,
  • steel from the Twin Towers turning to dust in mid-air,
  • relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions,
  • rapid spontaneous rusting of metal from the buildings,
  • over 1400 vehicles melted or warped while some distance away,
  • numerous flipped cars,
  • ground zero fuming for years without being hot,
  • numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells,
  • unburned paper,
  • unburned clothing,
  • unburned pedestrians,
  • elevated levels of tritium,
  • lack of ionising radiation and
  • glowing and molten materials.

Conversation

On top of that, Andrew chatted about suppression and censorship of the aforementioned, which is probably the largest meta-issue of them all.

Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic.

Judy Wood

Comments are closed.