Andrew Johnson contends that there is a deliberate effort to sidestep discussions linking secret technology (directed energy weapons, or DEW) to the destruction of the World Trade Centre.

The omissions [from the 9/11 Commission report] and distortions [are] so serious that the report is ultimately a false document.

Former 9/11 Commission member Max Cleland

The establishment has allowed alternative demolition theories like thermite, HAARP, and mini-nukes, while suppressing Dr Judy Wood’s research who, Andrew argues, has the most convincing case for what happened that day.

One thing we can absolutely disregard is the official story. No sane person believes that a few poorly trained Muslims, under the leadership of an old bearded Muslim with a Nokia 3310 in a cave in the Middle East, flew commercial aircraft into the World Trade Centre and Pentagon.

Twin Towers 9/11
What’s going on there?

What’s in a cover-up?

The multiple levels of the 9/11 cover-up are difficult to accept, argues believes.

Despite this, it’s important to rip it all apart.

To be clear, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was responsible for investigating the collapse of towers 1, 2, and 7. However, their report does not explain the rapid and complete destruction of the towers, and fails to account for the total lack of rubble, which appears to contradict their ‘pancake’ collapse theory.

Where is the rubble from two massive buildings?

Professors Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood legally challenged the NIST reports, but were pretty much ignored.

Andrew suggests that it’s also a good idea to combine looking at what did not happen and looking at what did happen.

For example, using physical laws, like gravity, and understanding the properties and limitations of materials (such as what burning jet fuel can and can’t do), helps verify the consistency of evidence.

His message is simple: form your own opinions by doing your own research and constantly questioning authority.

Zooming out

Alternative knowledge can show us that various vectors – including the energy cover-up going all the way back to Nikola Tesla – are linked to the 9/11 cover-up.

More specifically, social pressures, norms, and propaganda discourage individual research. The authorities don’t want us thinking critically.

Sadly, many experienced researchers become dogmatic, refusing to consider new evidence.

Andrew also touches on weather control, stating that humans have the capability, more or less, to steer hurricanes, and that this ability was evident in the days leading up to 9/11.

I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘You know we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.’ Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.

Larry Silverstein on WTC 7

He discusses material that has been available since 2008, but a lot of people don’t know about it because of all the censorship, cover-ups, and suppression.

So, what is going on?

Is there a cover-up of the cover-up?


I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described.

John Farmer, Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission

Comments are closed.