Andrew Johnson contends that there is a deliberate effort to sidestep discussions linking secret technology (directed energy weapons, or DEW) to the destruction of the World Trade Centre.
The establishment has allowed alternative demolition theories like thermite, HAARP, and mini-nukes, while suppressing Dr Judy Wood’s research who, Johnson argues, has the most convincing case for what happened that day.
What’s in a cover-up?
The multiple levels of the 9/11 cover-up are difficult to accept, understandably. Despite this, it’s important to rip apart the official reports funded by taxes.
To be clear, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was responsible for investigating the collapse of towers 1, 2, and 7. However, their report does not explain the rapid and complete destruction of the towers, and fails to account for the total lack of rubble, which contradicts their ‘pancake’ collapse theory.
Professors Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood legally challenged the NIST reports, but were pretty much ignored.
Johnson suggests that it’s also a good idea to combine looking at what did not happen and looking at what did happen. For example, using physical laws, like gravity, and understanding the properties and limits of materials (such as what burning jet fuel can and can’t do), helps verify the consistency of evidence.
His message is simple: form your own opinions by doing your own research and constantly questioning authority.
Exploring ‘alternative knowledge’, says Johnson, reveals that various topics – including the energy cover-up beginning with Nikola Tesla – are linked to the 9/11 cover-up.
More specifically, social pressures, norms, and propaganda discourage individual research. Daily life constraints further hinder things. Sadly, many experienced researchers become dogmatic, refusing to consider new evidence.
Johnson also touches on weather control, stating that humans have the capability, more or less, to steer hurricanes, and that this ability was evident in the days leading up to, and following, 9/11.
Much of the information about which Johnson speaks has been available since 2008, yet many people are still unaware of it due to extensive cover-ups, censorship, and suppresion.
So, what is going on?
Is there a cover-up of the cover-up?