David Rasnick is a biochemist who has spent decades studying AIDS and cancer.

He created DATE analysis as part of his cancer theory work. (DATE stands for Differentiation, Adaptation, Transformation, Evolution.) Rasnick used to be the president of Rethinking AIDS, a group that re-evaluates the HIV theory scientifically. He was also the president of the International Coalition for Medical Justice and was part of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa from 2000 to 2008.

Simply, David argues that AIDS is not a sexually transmitted disease.

He argues that every person carries dormant retroviruses in their genomes, and not one has been demonstrated to cause disease.

Quick history

For over three decades, the belief that HIV causes AIDS has been widely accepted.

In fact, anybody who questions it is labelled a ‘denier’, which is not in the spirit of science.

Numerous dissident thinkers argue (and have argued) that an analysis of established literature clearly shows that HIV is neither a necessary, nor a sufficient, cause of AIDS.

Put another way, AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is not a single-cause disease.

Big Pharma propaganda in Africa

The link between HIV and AIDS, long considered ‘settled science’, yet it is not even remotely settled science.

For example, Kary Mullis, PCR inventor and Nobel laureate, tried to find any scientific study showing that HIV causes AIDS, and couldn’t.

The mystery of that damn virus has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too.

Kary Mullis (circa 1992)

It’s all further complicated by the apparent existence of ‘HIV-negative’ cases combined with the evolving definition of AIDS. In fact, Luc Montagnier, who ‘discovered HIV’ even suggested that AIDS might be caused by a mycoplasma and not HIV.

Antiretroviral drugs are a bad idea

Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) are toxic and even deadly.

Their effectiveness is questionable and their widespread use is a product of the pharmaceutical industry (with buy-in from governments).

The mystery of that damn virus has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make a mystery out of it. I don’t think there’s any substantive evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS.

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner and PCR inventor

Furthermore, there is no gold-standard test for HIV infection.

This is because pure HIV virions have never been isolated from supposedly infected individuals. Additionally, the disproportionately high rate of HIV-positive ‘cases’ among black Africans is something former South African President Thabo Mbeki questioned.

Regarding PCR tests, page 17 and 18 of Mbeki’s 2001 AIDS Report is interesting (and reminds me of the Covid™ scam).

If you spend more than ten seconds thinking about it, then you will realise that a virus that targets poor blacks and gay men in nightclubs, is hilariously absurd.

Which is why the name was changed from GRIID to AIDS.

Dismantling the narrative

Being HIV+ is really easy
Being HIV+ is really easy

The 2009 documentary, House Of Numbers, dismantles the AIDS narrative.

According to the Perth Group, the following claims have never been shown to be true:

  1. The existence of a unique, exogenously acquired retrovirus, HIV.
  2. The “HIV” antibody tests are specific for “HIV” infection.
  3. The HIV theory of AIDS, that is, that HIV causes acquired immune deficiency (destruction of T4 lymphocytes=AID) or that AID leads to the development of the clinical syndrome AIDS.
  4. The “HIV genome”, (RNA or DNA) originates in a unique, exogenously acquired infectious retroviral particle.
  5. HIV/AIDS is infectious, either by blood, blood products or sexual intercourse.
  6. Mother to child transmission of a retrovirus HIV or its inhibition with AZT or nevirapine.

Read Rasnick’s opinion piece, The Tyranny Of Dogma, after listening to his conversation with me.

If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document.

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner and PCR inventor

Comments are closed.