James Fetzer on the 9/11 coverup

I have hosted a few 9/11 conversations, from Mike Berger arguing that controlled demolition was used, to Judy Wood’s hypothesis surrounding Directed Energy Weapons.

For clarity, the official story is as follows.

On 11 September, 2001, a series of coordinated terrorist attacks took place in the United States. Nineteen hijackers associated with the extremist group Al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial aircraft. Two of the planes were flown into the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, causing their subsequent collapse within hours. Another plane was flown into the Pentagon, severely damaging a section of the building. The fourth plane, United Airlines Flight 93, was headed towards a target in Washington DC but crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after passengers attempted to regain control from the hijackers.

However, the official story is full of holes.

Sixteen years after a series of coordinated terrorist attacks by al-Qaeda (as the story goes) shook the United States and the world, the number of questions-raised-left-unanswered has perhaps never been any higher.

Through their constant probing, investigating and challenging of the official story, world-class journalists, architects, engineers and families of the victims of 9/11 in particular have, however, to their credit, managed to unearth and pool together enough evidence over the years, to make a compelling case to suggest that the “official” narrative of 9/11 is only a “story” and not an accurate narration of what had actually happened.
Eresh Omar Jamal, The Daily Star, circa 2017

James Fetzer has been investigating 9/11 for many years.

There are numerous anomalies, from explosions being heard in the Twin Towers, to the towers free-falling into their own footprint, to no aircraft hitting the Pentagon, to no aircraft crash in Pennsylvania, to Building 7 free-falling many hours later after not being hit by anything, to a long list more.