Andrew Wilson hosts a very popular debate show on YouTube called The Crucible, and has a habit of ‘owning the libs’.
I strongly recommend listening to that conversation and reading her book Occult Feminism: The Secret History of Women’s Liberation. It will red pill you.
His wife, Rachel, previously spoke with me about the occultic roots of feminism and how women’s liberation actually enslaved women.
Both Andrew and Rachel are unbelievably based and a breath of fresh air in our current overly feminised environment. He often appears on the Whatever podcast, which is sort of like a dating-talk debate show.
Watch the following debate between Andrew and Matt Dillahunty, a fairly popular self-described atheist and secular humanist.
Well, to be clear, I use the word ‘debate’ loosely because there was no debate. Matt took great offence and rage-quit after Andrew’s opening monologue. It’s incredibly bizarre, considering Matt is supposedly a critical thinker of the highest quality.
I’ll retype that the first bit for effect.
Watch the following non-debate between Andrew and Matt Dillahunty, a popular self-described atheist and secular humanist.
I think it’s fair to say that Andrew destroyed him.
What is secular humanism?
Secular humanism is a hollow worldview.
It’s that simple.
It’s built on weak foundations like nontheism, evolution, and moral relativism – none of which stand up to logic, Andrew argues.
Secular humanism tries to push God aside and leaves people with a meaningless existence where right and wrong are just opinions. Everything is ‘my truth‘ and ‘your truth‘.
It’s all postmodern nonsense.
The belief that man is self-sufficient is a slippery slope because man is inherently dependent on God. Without God, self-sufficiency leads to a life without purpose, meaning, or moral grounding—a point Andrew argues persuasively.
Conversation
A foundational position of Andrew’s is that Christianity offers a framework for societal stability and individual flourishing. The Christian ethos, with its emphasis on personal responsibility and traditional family values, is the glue that holds society together.
Andrew says that feminism and egalitarianism have eroded traditional values and calls for a defence of these principles to preserve Western civilisation.
In other words, we must reject secular humanism in favour of a return to traditional, Christian-based societal norms.
I have no problem with that.